Sunday, 17 June 2012

The Good, The Bad and…..The Unknown


On Friday, I got around to booking tickets for Thomas Lund’s ‘farewell’ performance in September.  I have mentioned before that he is one of my favourite dancers with The Royal Danish Ballet.  He has a grace and elegance that fits so well with the Bournonville tradition of the company. 

So, the ‘good’ is that I managed to get tickets.  They went on sale to non season ticket holders on Thursday, and by Friday there were only a few seats left.  Another ‘good’ is that he will dance Jamie in ‘La Sylphide’, surely his signature piece.




The first ‘bad’ is that because I was a day late in booking tickets, I have not got particularly good seats.  Pity, but it will still be worth it I hope.  The other ‘bad’ is the other piece is Flemming Flindt’s ‘The Lesson’, which I really don’t like.  As well as being dated (at least I though so the last time I saw it a few year ago), it is such a dismal piece. Based on the Ionesco play, it tells the tale of a psychopathic dance teacher who abuses and kills his pupils.  Cheery stuff I am sure you agree!

And to the question mark – or rather marks.  The first question is – will the queen be there?  She often goes in a personal capacity, and with this being a special event, could well turn up.  I think I have attended performance ‘with’ her around 8 or 9 times.  Second, and more important, who is going to come with me?  I bought two tickets but have yet to ask anyone to come with me.  So, if you are in Copenhagen on 29th September and have 470 kr to spare, let me know!

Monday, 11 June 2012

It’s all about the footwork (or random jottings on a Monday evening)


Here, at least there is not that much happening in the dance world (well, there was Dansk Danseteater's open air 'Spring Dance' but the weather is not friendly to open air performances just now).   I haven't stopped reading - or indeed listening - about dance, however.

Last week I managed to catch a short documentary narrated by Deborah Bull about Pina Bausch on BBC Radio 4.   It was interesting to hear about dance and not just see it!  The programme was focused on who she was and her legacy, and obviously timed to coincide with the Pina Bausch season in London (you can read about it here http://www.barbican.org.uk/news/artformnews/theatredance/pina…).  I had wanted to hear it again before writing about it by unfortunately it was one of those programmes that are only available for 7 days. Hopefully it will be repeated at some point.

While I was on the BBC website, I  decided to do a search for ‘ballet’ to see if I could find anything interesting and one fun thing came up – this picture from 1961 of Western Theatre Ballet  in Walter Gore’s “Street Games”. Western Theatre Ballet was founded by Peter Darrell and Elizabeth West in 1957, and in 1969 moved to Glasgow, where they were first known as Scottish Theatre Ballet, eventually becoming Scottish Ballet in 1974.   


The dancers were Gail Donaldson and Peter Cazalet. Scottish Ballet is a company I grew up with, so it was kind of nice to find this.

final random note, which just must be about football, since Euro 2012 is kind of hard to escape at the moment.  Dance and football?  Well, indeed, yes.  There has been much written and discussed about the benefits of footballers learning plies and pirouettes to improve their agility, strength and – dare I say it – grace.  It helps to improve their footwork, which 'is what it is all about' or so I have been told!  There has even been a ballet about football, namely English National Ballet’s ‘The Beautiful Game’ from 2008.  You can listen to this review from ‘The Guardian’

I leave you with the thought of Zlatan Ibrahimovic learning battement frappeé.........



Sunday, 3 June 2012

From Darkness into Light


It was with great misgivings that I went to the last programme this season by the Royal Danish Ballet.  If you have read previous blogs, you know why.  However, I was determined to go to see Wayne McGregor’s ‘Chroma’ on stage rather than on You Tube (if you want to see it, there is a wonderful film of The Royal Ballet performing it).  It was also nice to go to Skuespilhuset down by the water and opposite the Opera House as a change of venue.

‘Chroma’, first performed in 2006, opened the evening.  It is a piece for ten dancers and, for a bit of trivia, is McGregor’s only piece for the Royal Ballet which is performed completely off pointe and was put together in 3 weeks (thanks  http://www.theballetbag.com/ for that!).  The wonderful, minimalist set is designed by the architect John Pawson and resembles a frame or square box through which dancers enter the stage. The music is by Joby Talbot, which includes some tracks by Jack White.  

I have to say I was pleasantly surprised and thoroughly enjoyed the performance.  It truly is a wonderful piece, full of fantastic shapes and wonderful choreography the jolts you out of complacency and reminds you just how wonderful dance can be.  I can say in all honesty that it is the best piece I have seen this year, and I know it will stick in my mind for a long time.  The set, music and movement all came together in perfect harmony.
In terms of the dancing, all credit to relative newcomer Sebastian Haynes, who has the makings of a fine dancer.  Alban Lendorf was also performing.  I know I go on about him, and while I cannot fault his technique as I have said before, he is far from graceful and looks, as my companion said ‘too much like a boxer’ in his physique.  However, he is bound to have a long and successful career, and I read somewhere that he is someone who could get snapped up by another company.





                                  Edward Watson and Alina Cojocaruin of The Royal Ballet in 'Chroma'


The second piece of the evening was ‘DEW’, a new piece (premiered during this season) by Danish choreographer Tina Tarpgaard.  Her pieces often involve fantastic use of light, with motion tracking cameras and software that monitors the movements of the dancers and responds with video that corresponds to the movement.  Her piece ‘Frost’, created for Dansk Danseteater, used this to great effect.  As a piece of theatre, it was really good, with interesting shapes, textures and colours appearing and blending into each other.  As a piece of choreography, it was dull, unimaginative and made far too much use of those old contemporary standbys, waving arms about and crossing the stage not really doing anything (there was a lot of floor rolling about as well, but that was to make use of the light effects).  

After the second interval (there were three!), we were treated to my second favourite piece of the evening, ‘Impénétrable songe’.  The choreography was by Patrick Delcroix, a former dancer and choreographer with Nederlands Dans Teater.  This was also a brand new piece.  The back-drop was a flowing curtain, sometimes moved by the dancers and incorporated into the movement to great effect.  I will say, it did remind me quite a bit of Nederlands Dans Teater’s style, which was probably why I liked it so much.  There were some wonderful shapes and movements that kept you interested and captivated.  The dancers were also in good form for this (I saw Gudrun Bojesen, Gitte Lindstrøm, Alba Nadal, Amy Watson, Ulrik Birkkjær, Jonathon Chmelensky and Tim Matiakis).



                                  Amy Watson and Jonathon Chmelensky in 'Impénétrable songe'


The final piece of the evening was ‘ergo ubi NARCISSUM per devia rura vagantem’ (yes – that is the title – I have not made some typos!).  Choreography was by Yuri Possokov (ex Bolshoi, ex Royal Danish Ballet, now San Francisco Ballet where he has been chief choreographer since 2006).  The music was various bits of Handel, and sung by Andrea Pellegrini, who was also present on the stage.  The scenery was composed of a large ball that reflected the dancers and formed, like the sets with the other three pieces, an integral part of the piece.  This was my least favourite of the evening, partly because of the singer on the stage (always far too much of a distraction) and partly because I found it rather pedestrian and unoriginal, though it certainly strived to be so.  There was just too much going on and, if I may say so, struck me as being just a little pretentious. 

Still, overall it was a good evening and at least I feel I have finished the season with something enjoyable and well worth seeing.  There seem to be some new dancers coming up that will be worth watching in seasons to come, and perhaps we will see some good things in the future.  I have looked at the programme for the coming season, and see the truly dreadful production of ‘Sleeping Beauty’ is being resurrected along with the natural quota of Bournonville.  Thomas Lund is due to retire next season, so I really hope I can get to see him one more time.  In the meantime, over the summer I hope to catch some bits and pieces of dance, read a biography of Balanchine and reflect over some issues that I think interesting when going to see a dance performance.  

PS – Linguistic note for those of you interested.  The evening was called ‘Sidste skrig’ which literally means ‘last shout’, but which also means ‘cutting edge’, both meanings in fact make perfect sense!

Sunday, 20 May 2012

Where to sit? The view from the audience

-->
I mentioned in an earlier blog that I was going to say something about where to sit to watch dance.  This is one of those topics that I will confess I have changed my mind about several times over the years.  I guess the truth is that you need to try out different locations until you find what you like and don’t like, and to keep in mind that theatres are all different, so what works in one might not be so good in another.  Always go for the best you can afford in any case.  There is nothing, however, that can be done about predicting who is going to sit in front of you (or indeed, behind you)!

In a traditional theatre, the first issue to address is stalls, circle or upper circle.  There was a period where I always sat in the stalls, as I wanted to be able to closely watch the feet and to be able to see the details of what was going on.  A friend of mine convinced me of the joys of sitting upstairs, from where you can see the patterns and shapes more clearly, and so for several years I always went for the circle or upper circle.  Well, here we have to consider a number of things.  Firstly, too far ‘up in the Gods’ and you probably won’t see anything (for example, I once went to see a Polish company in a piece that featured nudity, and I was so far back I couldn’t tell who were the men and who were the women…well, almost!).  Secondly, in some theatres like Gamle Scene in Copenhagen, there are many seats with an obscured view in the upper parts of the theatre.  If you suffer from vertigo, then some upper circle seats are really not for you (again, some of Gamle Scene).  More modern theatres such as the Festival Theatre in Edinburgh and the Opera House in Copenhagen have good seating upstairs, though watch out as in some big theatres, you will feel you are a long way from the stage and can feel a bit detached from the performance. 

The last two pieces I have seen have been in the stalls, and I have regained my fondness for that place in the theatre.  The front stalls in particular are a great place to sit.  For example, when I saw the Dance Theatre of Wuppertal’s ‘Rite of Spring’, I was so close I could smell the earth on the stage the dancers were performing upon.  However, I was glad I was upstairs when I saw Nureyev in ‘Prodigal Son’, the sweat trails on the stage would probably have been even worse close too!

This brings us to the type of performance space often used by contemporary companies, what I call the scaffolding and wobbly step type of seating.  This varies a lot from the good, such as I have experienced at The Tramway in Glasgow, to the sort where you wonder if you will end up falling through the seating during the performance.  It is best not to go for the front two or back two rows in my opinion if you don’t want to be part of the performance either by being too close or sitting right beside the people doing the lights.  It is particularly fun if the scaffolding is used as part of the performance, such as during a talk I once went to by Merce Cunningham which at one point included John Cage walking about underneath the seats, banging on the metal, creating rhythms for dance.

Finally, there are some venues that should not be used for dance, such as The Concert Hall in Tivoli, Copenhagen (which won’t stop be going to see Alvin Ailey there in September I may add).  It is also risky performing outside when in northern Europe, though sometimes it is glorious, when the sun is shining and the costumes billow in the wind.

So…my advice is experiment, get to know the theatre you are going to if possible, and keep your fingers crossed that there are only short people in front and no badly behaved children behind!

(Footnote – one of the most intriguing performances I have seen was Tim Rushton’s ‘Labyrinth’ where we as the audience walked around, almost interacting with the dancers, who danced in separate spaces.  That gave quite a different perspective of dance).

Saturday, 19 May 2012

East meets West: Dansk Danseteater & Beijing Dance Theater


Last Friday, I went to a really interesting evening of dance, interesting as it gave me an opportunity to not only see a new piece by Tim Rushton that had been premiered in Edinburgh by the Rambert Dance Company (‘Monolith’), but also to see some choreography and dancing from China.  It was the opening night of the pieces in Copenhagen.



 The opening piece was ‘Monolith’ (pictured above), inspired, according to the programme notes, by Stonehenge.  What a refreshing change to what I had seen the week before!  The dancers were engaged and moved with grace, elegance and strength.  The choreography was lyrical and clearly showed Rushton’s classical roots.  An excellent piece, set to music by Peteris Vasks.  I suggest you read about the Rambert rehearsals if you want to know more in the wonderful ‘theballetbag’.


The second piece, ‘Dead Fire’ was choreographed by Wang Yuanyuan, artistic director of the Beijing Dance Theater and danced by Dansk Danseteater.  This too was quite a lyrical piece, with a beautiful back drop.  The dancers cast ‘snow’ over the stage and on each other, giving the piece a soft edge to its at times harsh message (death always wins).  The dancers frequently had their back to the audience, sometimes a risky thing to do, but in this case it worked. 

The evening ended with ‘The End of Loneliness’, choreographed by Tim Rushton danced in the main by the company from Beijing, joined by the dancers of Dansk Danseteater.  The music was a strong percussion piece by Mathias Friis-Hansen.  Two things struck me most about this piece.  First, the women had the most beautiful arms I think I have seen in ages.  Long, elegant, they seemed to use every fibre of their arms from the tip of the middle finger to the shoulder.   The men too had good arms and nice strong jumps.  The second thing I noticed was Rushton’s sometimes lapse into, what I like to call the ‘oh help I don’t know what to do next so I’ll just get them to repeat the same thing three or four times’ routine.  I’ve seen him do this before, and it is such a shame to comment on this since I really like his work and he comes over as such a nice person in interviews!

The audience gave the evening a standing ovation, which I thought a little over the top, but it was definitely the highlight of any dance I have seen this year.  Rushton has done wonders with Dansk Danseteater and I hope it may long continue.  He has made mistakes (like the full length ‘Cinderella’ for the Danish Royal Ballet), but is full of talent and a breath of fresh air on the Danish dance scene.




Thursday, 17 May 2012

Balanchine and Stravinsky Part 3


And now to finally write a review of the third piece….

‘Symphony in Three Movements’ is a piece from 1972, and looked it.  Whether it was the long, ponytails sported by the women or the choreography, I am not sure, but it had a very 70s feel to it.  Although it was the most modern of the three pieces, it seemed like the oldest. 

It is an ensemble piece, and certainly full of energy, angular movements and verve.  I have read that Stravinsky composed the symphony's three movements at different times for three different films, although they were never actually used on screen.  On stage, with the dancing, it seemed like a seamless piece.

Well, like the rest of the evening, the piece was a bit of a disappointment, with little sparkle or dynamism.  In my view, The Royal Danish Ballet has lost its way and desperately needs something to boost it. 

There are two extra things to add on a more personal note about the evening.  One was that one of the ‘5 men’ in the last piece was Benjamin Buza, the son of the caretaker at Lygten 16 where I work.  It is always nice to spot someone you almost feel you know!

Secondly, a few days later when I was thinking over the evening, a terrible thought arose….what if the truth is that I don’t really like Balanchine?  I can understand why I fell in love with his style as a child since it was the first neo-classical choreography I saw, but maybe, just maybe, I am no longer a fan.  New York City Ballet are coming here next year, so we will see! 

(After thought….I thought NYCB were a big disappointment last time I saw them…).

Sunday, 6 May 2012

Stravinsky and Balanchine Part 2


And so to continue with the rest of the evening…

The second ballet of the evening was ‘Agon’ from 1957.  This is a wonderful work, one that I have seen described as being the ‘most complex and sophisticated of ballets’ (in the Faber Pocket Guide to Ballet).  It is one of those pieces that gets written about and discussed at great length, the wonderful relationship between the music and dance, the striking shapes and forms of the piece.

Balanchine structured his piece around Stravinsky’s score.  The ballet is built around 12 dancers (4 men and 8 women) and has 12 movements (4 sections of 3 dances).  The music alludes to 17th century French court dances (bransles, galliards and sarabande).  Brass instruments are used to identify the men and woodwind the women.  I can highly recommend The Ballet Bag for an excellent overview (http://www.theballetbag.com/2009/10/05/agon/ )

The structure takes this form:

Pas de Quatre for the men
Double Pas de Quatre  for the women
Triple Pas de Quatre for all 12 dancers

Prelude for 1 man & 2 women
Saraband-step for 1 man
Galliard for 2 women
Coda for 1 man & 2 women

Interlude for 2 men and women
Bransle simple for 2 men

Bransle gai for 1 woman
Bransle double for 2 men and 1 woman
Interlude for 1 man & 1 woman
Pas de Deux for 1 man & 1 woman
Four Pas de Deux for the men & 4 women
Four Pas de Trois for all 12 dancers
Coda: all the dancers


Now to the performance on Thursday!  Apart from one of the dancers nearly falling over (but gracefully recovering), the dancing was fine and technically competent.  However, as usual I am afraid, there was no ‘oomph’, no dynamism, nothing to remember.  The central pas de deux, which should be a show stopper, passed me by.  I have just watched a rather poor quality video I found on YouTube of Agon danced by New York City Ballet in the 1980s and, even watching on my computer screen, I was entranced and gripped by the exciting and enervating performance. That was what I had hoped for on Thursday but as usual was disappointed with RDB.

However, I would like to heap praise on one dancer, Jon Axel Fransson from Iceland, who had energy, verve and a sparkle lacking in the other dancers. 

Part three to follow…..